Uncertainty Intolerance

by Psychology Roots
70 views
A+A-
Reset

Uncertainty Intolerance

Here in this post, we are sharing the “Uncertainty Intolerance”. You can read psychometric and Author information.  We have thousands of Scales and questionnaires in our collection (See Scales and Questionnaires). You can demand us any scale and questionnaires related to psychology through our community, and we will provide you with a short time. Keep visiting Psychology Roots.

About Uncertainty Intolerance

Scale Name

Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale – Short Form (IUS-12) (Uncertainty Intolerance)

Author Details

Carleton, Norton, & Asmundson

Translation Availability

Not Sure

Uncertainty Intolerance
Uncertainty Intolerance

Background/Description

The IUS-12 is a short version of the original 27-item Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale (Freeston, Rhéaume, Letarte, Dugas, & Ladouceur, 1994) that measures responses to uncertainty, ambiguous situations, and the future (Carleton, in press). The 12 items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (not at all characteristic of me) to 5 (entirely characteristic of me).

The Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale – Short Form (IUS-12) has a strong correlation with the original scale, rs = .94 to .96 (Carleton, Norton, et al., 2007; Khawaja & Yu, 2010), a continuous latent structure (Carleton, Weeks et al., 2012), and has been shown to have two factors (Carleton, Norton, et al., 2007; McEvoy & Mahoney, 2011), prospective IU (7 items; e.g., “I can’t stand being taken by surprise”) and inhibitory IU (5 items; e.g., “When it’s time to act, uncertainty paralyzes me”), both with identically high internal consistencies, α = .85 (Carleton, Norton, et al., 2007).

The IU construct has been found to be ubiquitous, with scores comparable across anxiety disorders and depression (Carleton, Mulvogue et al., 2012). The IUS-12 was selected to measure IU because it is comparable to, but briefer than, the longer original IUS (Khawaja & Yu, 2010) and the new symptom-focused Intolerance of Uncertainty Index (IUI; Carleton, Gosselin, & Asmundson, 2010; Gosselin et al., 2008).

Administration, Scoring and Interpretation

  • Provide the participant with a copy of the IUS-12 questionnaire.
  • Instruct the participant to read each item carefully and rate how characteristic each item is of them using the following scale:
  • Ensure that the participant completes all 12 items.
  • Score the questionnaire by adding up the participant’s responses to all 12 items.
  • Interpret the participant’s score using the following guidelines:
    • Scores of 36 or less indicate low IU
    • Scores of 37 to 48 indicate moderate IU
    • Scores of 49 or more indicate high IU

Reliability and Validity

Good convergent and discriminant validity, as well as internal consistency, have been demonstrated by the total score and both subscale scores (Carleton, Norton, et al., 2007; McEvoy & Mahoney, 2011).

Available Versions

12-Items

Reference

Freeston, M., Rhéaume, J., Letarte, H., Dugas, M. J., & Ladouceur, R. (1994). Why do people worry? Personality and Individual Differences, 17, 791-802. doi: 10.1016/0191-8869(94)90048-5Carleton, R. N. (in press). The intolerance of uncertainty constructs in the context of anxiety disorders: Theoretical and practical perspectives. Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics.

Important Link

Scale File:

Disclaimer

Please note that Psychology Roots does not have the right to grant permission for the use of any psychological scales or assessments listed on its website. To use any scale or assessment, you must obtain permission directly from the author or translator of the tool. Psychology Roots provides information about various tools and their administration procedures, but it is your responsibility to obtain proper permissions before using any scale or assessment. If you need further information about an author’s contact details, please submit a query to the Psychology Roots team.

Help Us Improve This Article

Have you discovered an inaccuracy? We put out great effort to give accurate and scientifically trustworthy information to our readers. Please notify us if you discover any typographical or grammatical errors.
Make a comment. We acknowledge and appreciate your efforts.

Share With Us

If you have any scale or any material related to psychology kindly share it with us at psychologyroots@gmail.com. We help others on behalf of you.

Follow

Related Posts

Leave a Comment

Adblock Detected

Please support us by disabling your AdBlocker extension from your browsers for our website.