Table of Contents
Death Anxiety Questionnaire
Here in this post, we are sharing the “Death Anxiety Questionnaire”. You can read psychometric and Author information. We have thousands of Scales and questionnaires in our collection (See Scales and Questionnaires). You can demand us any scale and questionnaires related to psychology through our community, and we will provide you with a short time. Keep visiting Psychology Roots.
About Scale Name
Scale Name
Death Anxiety Questionnaire
Author Details
H R Conte, M B Weiner, R Plutchik
Translation Availability
Not Sure
Background/Description
The Death Anxiety Questionnaire (DAQ) is a psychological tool developed by Conte, Weiner, and Plutchik in 1982 to measure the level of death anxiety that an individual experiences. The DAQ consists of 15 items that assess different aspects of death anxiety, such as fear of the unknown, concern about the dying process, and fear of separation from loved ones.
Each item on the DAQ is rated on a five-point scale, ranging from “strongly disagree” to “strongly agree.” The total score on the DAQ can range from 15 to 75, with higher scores indicating greater levels of death anxiety.
The DAQ has been used in various research studies to investigate the relationship between death anxiety and other psychological constructs, such as personality traits, coping strategies, and mental health outcomes. It is also commonly used in clinical settings to assess the level of death anxiety in patients with terminal illnesses or other life-threatening conditions.
Administration, Scoring and Interpretation
The Death Anxiety Questionnaire (DAQ) is typically administered as a self-report questionnaire. Individuals who are taking the DAQ will be given a set of instructions for completing the questionnaire, which usually involves reading and responding to each item on the questionnaire.
Each item on the DAQ is rated on a five-point Likert scale, with response options ranging from “strongly disagree” to “strongly agree.” Participants are asked to choose the response that best reflects their feelings about each statement.
Once all items on the DAQ have been completed, the scores are tallied to give an overall score for death anxiety. The total score can range from 15 to 75, with higher scores indicating greater levels of death anxiety.
It is important to note that the DAQ is just one tool for assessing death anxiety and should not be used as the sole basis for diagnosing or treating any mental health condition. It should always be used in conjunction with other assessment tools and clinical judgment.
Reliability and Validity
The Death Anxiety Questionnaire (DAQ) has been shown to have good reliability and validity in various studies. Reliability of the DAQ refers to the consistency of scores obtained from the questionnaire, while validity refers to how well the questionnaire measures what it is intended to measure.
One study by Tarakeshwar et al. (2003) found that the DAQ had good internal consistency, with a Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of 0.85, indicating that the items of the questionnaire were measuring the same construct consistently. Another study by Gesser et al. (1987) found that the DAQ had good test-retest reliability over a two-week period, with correlations between the two administrations ranging from 0.69 to 0.80.
In terms of validity, several studies have found that the DAQ is a valid measure of death anxiety. For example, Tomer and Eliason (1996) found that the DAQ was significantly correlated with other measures of death anxiety, such as the Multidimensional Fear of Death Scale, indicating that the DAQ was measuring the same construct. Other studies have also found significant relationships between scores on the DAQ and other psychological constructs, such as depression, anxiety, and coping strategies.
Overall, the DAQ appears to be a reliable and valid tool for measuring death anxiety in research and clinical settings. However, like all assessment tools, it is important to interpret scores on the DAQ in conjunction with other assessment information and clinical judgment.
Available Versions
15-Items
Reference
Conte, H. R., Weiner, M. B., & Plutchik, R. (1982). Measuring death anxiety: conceptual, psychometric, and factor-analytic aspects. Journal of personality and social psychology, 43(4), 775–785. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.43.4.775
Important Link
Scale File:
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the purpose of the DAQ?
The DAQ is a psychological tool designed to measure an individual’s level of death anxiety. It assesses different aspects of death anxiety, such as fear of the unknown, concern about the dying process, and fear of separation from loved ones.
How is the DAQ scored?
The DAQ is scored by adding up the values of each item response. Each item on the DAQ is rated on a five-point scale, with response options ranging from “strongly disagree” to “strongly agree.” The total score can range from 15 to 75, with higher scores indicating greater levels of death anxiety.
Is the DAQ a reliable measure of death anxiety?
Yes, several studies have found that the DAQ has good reliability and internal consistency. For example, one study found a Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of 0.85, indicating that the items of the questionnaire were measuring the same construct consistently.
Is the DAQ a valid measure of death anxiety?
Yes, several studies have found that the DAQ is a valid measure of death anxiety. For example, it has been shown to be significantly correlated with other measures of death anxiety, such as the Multidimensional Fear of Death Scale.
Can the DAQ be used in clinical settings?
Yes, the DAQ can be used in clinical settings to assess the level of death anxiety in patients with terminal illnesses or other life-threatening conditions. However, like all assessment tools, it should always be used in conjunction with other assessment information and clinical judgment.
Disclaimer
Please note that Psychology Roots does not have the right to grant permission for the use of any psychological scales or assessments listed on its website. To use any scale or assessment, you must obtain permission directly from the author or translator of the tool. Psychology Roots provides information about various tools and their administration procedures, but it is your responsibility to obtain proper permissions before using any scale or assessment. If you need further information about an author’s contact details, please submit a query to the Psychology Roots team.
Help Us Improve This Article
Have you discovered an inaccuracy? We put out great effort to give accurate and scientifically trustworthy information to our readers. Please notify us if you discover any typographical or grammatical errors.
Make a comment. We acknowledge and appreciate your efforts.
If you have any scale or any material related to psychology kindly share it with us at psychologyroots@gmail.com. We help others on behalf of you.
