Table of Contents
Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding
Here in this post, we are sharing the “Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding”. You can read psychometric and Author information. We have thousands of Scales and questionnaires in our collection (See Scales and Questionnaires). You can demand us any scale and questionnaires related to psychology through our community, and we will provide you with a short time. Keep visiting Psychology Roots.
About Scale Name
Scale Name
Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding
Author Details
David Paulhus
Translation Availability
Not Sure
Background/Description
The Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding (BIDR) is a personality test that measures two aspects of socially desirable responding: self-deceptive enhancement (SDE) and impression management (IM). SDE is the tendency to view oneself in an overly positive light, even if it is not accurate. IM is the tendency to present oneself in a favorable light to others, even if it is not accurate.
The BIDR was developed by David Paulhus in 1984. Paulhus was interested in developing a measure of socially desirable responding that was more reliable and valid than existing measures. He also wanted to develop a measure that could distinguish between two different types of socially desirable responding: SDE and IM.
The BIDR is a 40-item self-report inventory that uses a 7-point Likert scale. Respondents are asked to indicate how strongly they agree or disagree with each statement. The BIDR has two subscales:
- SDE: This subscale measures the tendency to view oneself in an overly positive light. Examples of items on this subscale include “I am always willing to admit when I am wrong” and “I am always polite, even to people I don’t like.”
- IM: This subscale measures the tendency to present oneself in a favorable light to others. Examples of items on this subscale include “I am always willing to help others” and “I am never envious of others’ success.”
The BIDR has been shown to be a reliable and valid measure of socially desirable responding. It has been used in a variety of research settings, including clinical psychology, personality psychology, and organizational psychology. The BIDR can be used to assess the extent to which respondents are responding in a socially desirable manner, which can help to identify potential biases in self-report data.
The BIDR has been shown to be related to a number of other constructs, including self-esteem, narcissism, and psychopathy. It has also been shown to be predictive of a variety of outcomes, such as job performance, academic achievement, and relationship satisfaction.
The BIDR is a valuable tool for researchers and clinicians who want to assess the extent to which respondents are responding in a socially desirable manner. It is a reliable and valid measure that has been used in a variety of research settings. The BIDR can help to identify potential biases in self-report data and can provide insights into the personality and motivations of respondents.
Administration, Scoring and Interpretation
- The administrator should read the instructions to the respondent.
- The respondent should read each item of the BIDR and indicate how strongly they agree or disagree with the statement using a 7-point Likert scale.
- The respondent should complete all 40 items of the BIDR.
- The respondent should return the completed BIDR to the administrator.
Reliability and Validity
The Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding (BIDR) is a reliable and valid measure of socially desirable responding. It has been shown to have good internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and convergent and discriminant validity.
Internal consistency is a measure of how well the items on a test measure the same construct. The BIDR has good internal consistency, with coefficient alphas of 0.84 for the SDE subscale and 0.80 for the IM subscale. This means that the items on the BIDR are all measuring the same construct of socially desirable responding.
Test-retest reliability is a measure of how consistent a test is over time. The BIDR has good test-retest reliability, with correlations of 0.82 for the SDE subscale and 0.78 for the IM subscale. This means that if a person takes the BIDR twice, they are likely to get similar scores both times.
Convergent validity is a measure of how well a test correlates with other measures of the same construct. The BIDR has good convergent validity with other measures of socially desirable responding, such as the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale and the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire.
Discriminant validity is a measure of how well a test distinguishes between different constructs. The BIDR has good discriminant validity with other constructs, such as self-esteem, anxiety, and depression. This means that the BIDR is not simply measuring these other constructs.
Available Versions
40-Items
Reference
Paulhus, D. L. (1991). Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding (BIDR): Measures of Impression Management and Self-Deception. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Important Link
Scale File:
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the BIDR?
The BIDR is a self-report inventory that measures two aspects of socially desirable responding: self-deceptive enhancement (SDE) and impression management (IM).
Who developed the BIDR?
The BIDR was developed by David Paulhus.
What are the two subscales of the BIDR?
The two subscales of the BIDR are SDE (self-deceptive enhancement) and IM (impression management).
How long does it take to take the BIDR?
The BIDR takes about 10-15 minutes to complete.
What is the scoring method for the BIDR?
The BIDR is scored using a 7-point Likert scale.
What are the psychometric properties of the BIDR?
The BIDR has good internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and convergent and discriminant validity.
Disclaimer
Please note that Psychology Roots does not have the right to grant permission for the use of any psychological scales or assessments listed on its website. To use any scale or assessment, you must obtain permission directly from the author or translator of the tool. Psychology Roots provides information about various tools and their administration procedures, but it is your responsibility to obtain proper permissions before using any scale or assessment. If you need further information about an author’s contact details, please submit a query to the Psychology Roots team.
Help Us Improve This Article
Have you discovered an inaccuracy? We put out great effort to give accurate and scientifically trustworthy information to our readers. Please notify us if you discover any typographical or grammatical errors.
Make a comment. We acknowledge and appreciate your efforts.
If you have any scale or any material related to psychology kindly share it with us at psychologyroots@gmail.com. We help others on behalf of you.
